Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 22:03:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0072583CB2DAF3A996145791EE96F3EEC272DFB593E0AE777E3C5F74FA75DA8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report is currently being questioned on its validity, due to evidence popping up that points to the lead researcher on it having pre-existing anti-trans bias. You cannot use the report itself as evidence that the report is not biased. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780021506837270597
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0072583CB2DAF3A996145791EE96F3EEC272DFB593E0AE777E3C5F74FA75DA8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1713305034833
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17800215068372705970072583CB2DAF3A996145791EE96F3EEC272DFB593E0AE777E3C5F74FA75DA8C