Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-16 14:58:22 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FF280EA9F81719678E0979AF535DECE18607CBAE645E6502384994EB3D3455F4
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - not only is citing the Cass Report as proof of the Cass Reports reliability circular reasoning and therefore invalid, but it is not widely recognized as reliable by peers. It's clearly a politically motivated report, and so is it's support. https://www.advocate.com/health/hilary-cass-nhs-report-debunked https://transactual.org.uk/blog/2024/04/11/press-release-the-cass-review-is-bad-science-and-should-not-be-taken-seriously-by-policymakers/ https://uncommon-scents.blogspot.com/2024/04/opinion-cass-review-and-trans.html?m=1 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/drrobagnew_bad-news-for-our-trans-youth-this-morning-activity-7183695620790980608-dOSs
All Note Details