Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-16 15:55:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FD1290D5F1259C28318A8EA603DE03C36713EAF4B8A4F5DCAA938D07A0BBD06F
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - not only is citing the Cass Report as proof of the Cass Reports reliability circular reasoning and therefore invalid, but it is not widely recognized as reliable by peers. It's clearly a politically motivated report, and so is it's support. https://www.advocate.com/health/hilary-cass-nhs-report-debunked https://transactual.org.uk/blog/2024/04/11/press-release-the-cass-review-is-bad-science-and-should-not-be-taken-seriously-by-policymakers/ https://uncommon-scents.blogspot.com/2024/04/opinion-cass-review-and-trans.html?m=1 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/drrobagnew_bad-news-for-our-trans-youth-this-morning-activity-7183695620790980608-dOSs
All Note Details