Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-16 23:14:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D65346144903331208576E91750FD61067DA342E71A47F90EE1F88E8BC355B96
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - not only is citing the Cass Report as proof of the Cass Reports reliability circular reasoning and therefore invalid, but it is not widely recognized as reliable by peers. It's clearly a politically motivated report, and so is it's support. https://www.advocate.com/health/hilary-cass-nhs-report-debunked https://transactual.org.uk/blog/2024/04/11/press-release-the-cass-review-is-bad-science-and-should-not-be-taken-seriously-by-policymakers/ https://uncommon-scents.blogspot.com/2024/04/opinion-cass-review-and-trans.html?m=1 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/drrobagnew_bad-news-for-our-trans-youth-this-morning-activity-7183695620790980608-dOSs
All Note Details