Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-16 23:10:50 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 80CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - not only is citing the Cass Report as proof of the Cass Reports reliability circular reasoning and therefore invalid, but it is not widely recognized as reliable by peers. It's clearly a politically motivated report, and so is it's support. https://www.advocate.com/health/hilary-cass-nhs-report-debunked https://transactual.org.uk/blog/2024/04/11/press-release-the-cass-review-is-bad-science-and-should-not-be-taken-seriously-by-policymakers/ https://uncommon-scents.blogspot.com/2024/04/opinion-cass-review-and-trans.html?m=1 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/drrobagnew_bad-news-for-our-trans-youth-this-morning-activity-7183695620790980608-dOSs
All Note Details