Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 07:13:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0CD44E8794F27745B86028C5BB57A7EB34D81CB3A6AE0BE0130E4708E27F5E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass review cites the evidence used, in a series of appendices. The use of AI-generated images avoids the need for consent, and avoids the possibility of exposing them to public vilification. https://cass.independent-review.uk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780003942140674199
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0CD44E8794F27745B86028C5BB57A7EB34D81CB3A6AE0BE0130E4708E27F5E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1713251585875
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1780003942140674199E0CD44E8794F27745B86028C5BB57A7EB34D81CB3A6AE0BE0130E4708E27F5E6