Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 13:44:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E4E8566DBA288F9FB7310B6E22B85CCB50424A209BCA37E5D210B26AEB02724
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Clearly the opinion of the poster, reasonably held given the evidence. You cannot cite the dictionary definition of words as if those are sources to try and legitimise notes that are baseless.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779988265979850959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E4E8566DBA288F9FB7310B6E22B85CCB50424A209BCA37E5D210B26AEB02724
  • createdAtMillis - 1713275081600
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17799882659798509594E4E8566DBA288F9FB7310B6E22B85CCB50424A209BCA37E5D210B26AEB02724