Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 04:59:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5797ADE87D1AC9490BB611004B754D717439C3BD4E055F6E9CFBE5E72FB653F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - above note on nullification would be true if jury did this through their own choice and without being influenced. However, attempting to exert influence over a jury in order to achieve this IS tampering, which is what is being referred to in the post

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779939229713273044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5797ADE87D1AC9490BB611004B754D717439C3BD4E055F6E9CFBE5E72FB653F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1713243591894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17799392297132730445797ADE87D1AC9490BB611004B754D717439C3BD4E055F6E9CFBE5E72FB653F0