Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 18:28:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 470CC13033B310EC5CC165F7B6362A2A6BDB5F563D8AEAE4BC201A911D695E51
Participant Details

Original Note:

People are free to interpret the intention of someone elses post and critique it. How can they be misrepresenting Rachel Riley when they include the post of hers being discussed in full?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779936950842958060
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 470CC13033B310EC5CC165F7B6362A2A6BDB5F563D8AEAE4BC201A911D695E51
  • createdAtMillis - 1713205684186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779936950842958060470CC13033B310EC5CC165F7B6362A2A6BDB5F563D8AEAE4BC201A911D695E51