Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 01:14:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45D54E0EDD1564ADB106BD5514CE615A21BE02CFEE292130EB3A85C5E694D7B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

People are free to interpret the intention of someone elses post and critique it. How can they be misrepresenting Rachel Riley when they include the post of hers being discussed in full?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779936950842958060
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45D54E0EDD1564ADB106BD5514CE615A21BE02CFEE292130EB3A85C5E694D7B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1713230087407
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177993695084295806045D54E0EDD1564ADB106BD5514CE615A21BE02CFEE292130EB3A85C5E694D7B9