Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 04:02:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87A83D5F97821E7E9EBB353F10911FBC907B083E34BFE4B6644C64452E4DD75D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed notes are a gross abuse of the CN system, and look like a coordinated attempt to subvert it. They have nothing to add but speculation about the motives behind the post, or irrelevant opinions about and allegations against JK Rowling that belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779907072647139749
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87A83D5F97821E7E9EBB353F10911FBC907B083E34BFE4B6644C64452E4DD75D
  • createdAtMillis - 1713240154150
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177990707264713974987A83D5F97821E7E9EBB353F10911FBC907B083E34BFE4B6644C64452E4DD75D