Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 14:17:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF70169287266248E2032F179DFF81563EB2FAB265AE7D2D4178B73578950E84
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Review did not dismisss 100s of studies. It assessed the 103 studies across 2 literature reviews (it assessed 43 of them as low quality) and reported the findings of all the studies (eg Figure 36 pg 193). See https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779232332508971409/ for a detailed explanation. The Review did not cite ROGD at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779873114383319178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF70169287266248E2032F179DFF81563EB2FAB265AE7D2D4178B73578950E84
  • createdAtMillis - 1713190630290
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779873114383319178EF70169287266248E2032F179DFF81563EB2FAB265AE7D2D4178B73578950E84