Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 06:32:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19E667D4EBCA0818C5242591F3188C758AD3B9408B7764239D63A77F6838A99E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Review did not dismisss 100s of studies. It assessed the 103 studies across 2 literature reviews (it assessed 43 of them as low quality) and reported the findings of all the studies (eg Figure 36 pg 193). See https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779232332508971409/ for a detailed explanation. The Review did not cite ROGD at all.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779873114383319178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19E667D4EBCA0818C5242591F3188C758AD3B9408B7764239D63A77F6838A99E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713249156100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 177987311438331917819E667D4EBCA0818C5242591F3188C758AD3B9408B7764239D63A77F6838A99E