Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 08:19:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CCE66646BF04F1563B2E684A53B3C569CB993BC3F68194A64F9A4AB175CB544
Participant Details

Original Note:

Abgesehen, dass Syrien den Schutz hätte gewährleisten müssen, verliert eine Botschaft ihren Schutzstatus, wenn sie wie hier militärischen Zwecken dient. Der Angriff zielte auf Personen ab, die an militärischen Operationen gegen Israel beteiligt waren und war somit legitim. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/02/world/europe/interpreter-israel-syria-embassy.html https://www.syriahr.com/en/329999/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779772116952383530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CCE66646BF04F1563B2E684A53B3C569CB993BC3F68194A64F9A4AB175CB544
  • createdAtMillis - 1713169185207
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17797721169523835307CCE66646BF04F1563B2E684A53B3C569CB993BC3F68194A64F9A4AB175CB544