Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 14:35:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E461CBFBE1653A3BF6EEDA01936CF4AFC1402A339D22D1E2262C1D2BF27557D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The systematic literature reviews in question included in their syntheses 2 high-quality studies and 58 moderate-quality studies. They only didn't include the low-quality studies. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779671152148857212

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779711129981239557
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E461CBFBE1653A3BF6EEDA01936CF4AFC1402A339D22D1E2262C1D2BF27557D
  • createdAtMillis - 1713191743737
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17797111299812395578E461CBFBE1653A3BF6EEDA01936CF4AFC1402A339D22D1E2262C1D2BF27557D