Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 12:08:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 701A1E8A0953D004DB93D3BE32B54D5389B8DB21630C949D8A6A0BBD25EAF978
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The claim IS false. One systematic review looked at 50 and included in its synthesis 1 high-quality study and 25 moderate-quality studies. Another review examined 53 studies, and included in its synthesis 1 high-quality study and 33 moderate-quality studies. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306273701339548

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779640742912077858
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 701A1E8A0953D004DB93D3BE32B54D5389B8DB21630C949D8A6A0BBD25EAF978
  • createdAtMillis - 1713182885092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779640742912077858701A1E8A0953D004DB93D3BE32B54D5389B8DB21630C949D8A6A0BBD25EAF978