Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-18 14:03:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The claim IS false. One systematic review looked at 50 and included in its synthesis 1 high-quality study and 25 moderate-quality studies. Another review examined 53 studies, and included in its synthesis 1 high-quality study and 33 moderate-quality studies. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306273701339548

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779640742912077858
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578
  • createdAtMillis - 1713449021814
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177964074291207785830B8C2C6AB8001CEF5603142059CA97AE20CD90C68A39744E2F78FE66FC06578