Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 10:17:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1A753CE83079A8B525BB5BF348FF8789786A0D3C0A129FA5B606BC60359D986
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect. One systematic review looked at 50 and included in its synthesis 1 high-quality study and 25 moderate-quality studies. Another review examined 53 studies, and included in its synthesis 1 high-quality study and 33 moderate-quality studies. https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306273701339548

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779639788514967980
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1A753CE83079A8B525BB5BF348FF8789786A0D3C0A129FA5B606BC60359D986
  • createdAtMillis - 1713176221868
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779639788514967980D1A753CE83079A8B525BB5BF348FF8789786A0D3C0A129FA5B606BC60359D986