Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 11:04:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FA2D6CAB93FEE5F3B9D621C8B6E19B653C53EE38EDDFCD4FE10DD5CBB264994
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not a note: this is a response to a user’s question, asking for an explanation why retroactive continuity has taken place. The author appears to be pretending they have not done this, which should be noted. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_negationism#:~:text=Historical%20negationism%2C%20also%20called%20historical,reasoned%20academic%20reinterpretations%20of%20history.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779625246925930840
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FA2D6CAB93FEE5F3B9D621C8B6E19B653C53EE38EDDFCD4FE10DD5CBB264994
  • createdAtMillis - 1713179093434
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17796252469259308409FA2D6CAB93FEE5F3B9D621C8B6E19B653C53EE38EDDFCD4FE10DD5CBB264994