Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-14 18:18:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70037FB5AAB05A4C397F487D05B425AC203C3221B5B06439AAD49B54D1A26170
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - personal opinion. As a comment on the current note in waiting: using the Cass review as a source on if the Cass review is biased is not a good choice.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779526183677206580
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 70037FB5AAB05A4C397F487D05B425AC203C3221B5B06439AAD49B54D1A26170
  • createdAtMillis - 1713118702015
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177952618367720658070037FB5AAB05A4C397F487D05B425AC203C3221B5B06439AAD49B54D1A26170