Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-14 17:01:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 090FD115411778D2AF1E09D5C63B6ABE08D5C1508066E21CADC556EF31DFB5E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - personal opinion. As a comment on the current note in waiting: using the Cass review as a source on if the Cass review is biased is not a good choice.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779526183677206580
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 090FD115411778D2AF1E09D5C63B6ABE08D5C1508066E21CADC556EF31DFB5E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1713114095252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779526183677206580090FD115411778D2AF1E09D5C63B6ABE08D5C1508066E21CADC556EF31DFB5E5