Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 10:40:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFC189B52A28A4461C92950CAAB7EA4FB2BB57F626CFC1E66C7547F64473AAA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect. Two systematic reviews by York University for the Cass Report examined 103 studies. It assessed as 2 high-quality, 58 as moderate-quality and 43 as low-quality. Only the low-quality studies were excluded from the synthesis (42%) https://x.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306273701339548?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779481148751528124
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFC189B52A28A4461C92950CAAB7EA4FB2BB57F626CFC1E66C7547F64473AAA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1713177653808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779481148751528124EFC189B52A28A4461C92950CAAB7EA4FB2BB57F626CFC1E66C7547F64473AAA3