Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 10:15:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 094CD7BAAC9979E73A5D592061A67441864950A3781405C93921AB78307AE979
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incorrect. Two systematic reviews by York University for the Cass Report examined 103 studies. It assessed as 2 high-quality, 58 as moderate-quality and 43 as low-quality. Only the low-quality studies were excluded from the synthesis (42%) https://x.com/benryanwriter/status/1779306273701339548?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779481148751528124
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 094CD7BAAC9979E73A5D592061A67441864950A3781405C93921AB78307AE979
  • createdAtMillis - 1713176153857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1779481148751528124094CD7BAAC9979E73A5D592061A67441864950A3781405C93921AB78307AE979