Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 07:01:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A88048EE54209DF4A95D51A04D7784ED9DB0C59548FFA440D0B3F22867B1B1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The Cass Review did discount numerous studies and papers. Whether or not you think that is justified should be taken to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779292014053396819
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A88048EE54209DF4A95D51A04D7784ED9DB0C59548FFA440D0B3F22867B1B1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1713164496530
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17792920140533968190A88048EE54209DF4A95D51A04D7784ED9DB0C59548FFA440D0B3F22867B1B1A