Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 05:26:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA5E8C1BA8D99D2B62F168B376E247E9125AFF4FC952A9BA7B073078C292A548
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr Bragg has zero professional competence in this. The Cass Review is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment of available research in history in this area. Many studies were discounted for poor quality and lack of long-term tracking of patients. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779205032644120758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA5E8C1BA8D99D2B62F168B376E247E9125AFF4FC952A9BA7B073078C292A548
  • createdAtMillis - 1713158805147
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779205032644120758EA5E8C1BA8D99D2B62F168B376E247E9125AFF4FC952A9BA7B073078C292A548