Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 17:21:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C62C05FBF7215A46366A6B7AA90B3C36693B3D3E21939F33C07823C8EF4E99C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr Bragg has zero professional competence in this. The Cass Review is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment of available research in history in this area. Many studies were discounted for poor quality and lack of long-term tracking of patients. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779205032644120758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C62C05FBF7215A46366A6B7AA90B3C36693B3D3E21939F33C07823C8EF4E99C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1713201684271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779205032644120758C62C05FBF7215A46366A6B7AA90B3C36693B3D3E21939F33C07823C8EF4E99C6