Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 17:37:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FA6A156F178320D4DE9599D4939BA2546C8AC88E81BF4EB0A07132291F0EAB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr Bragg has zero professional competence in this. The Cass Review is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment of available research in history in this area. Many studies were discounted for poor quality and lack of long-term tracking of patients. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779205032644120758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FA6A156F178320D4DE9599D4939BA2546C8AC88E81BF4EB0A07132291F0EAB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1713202675998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17792050326441207580FA6A156F178320D4DE9599D4939BA2546C8AC88E81BF4EB0A07132291F0EAB8