Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-14 17:02:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9598749AA91727D707EC976CDC96923CFF14B2CA5AD766480A6DC392BFE3A3F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This has been answered over and over -here it is (point 6) in 2002. Some might have further doubts, but anyone who just didn't bother to Google it at all is not looking for the truth, but lazily farming engagement, and it's not good for anyone to indulge them. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779154232303652925
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9598749AA91727D707EC976CDC96923CFF14B2CA5AD766480A6DC392BFE3A3F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1713114137481
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17791542323036529259598749AA91727D707EC976CDC96923CFF14B2CA5AD766480A6DC392BFE3A3F7