Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 00:37:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C
Participant Details

Original Note:

この発言は著しい誤った認識を前提としている。 そもそも、親権には虐待を監視する法的権限はなく、海外の立法例にも存在しない。 親権の定義(法務省) https://www.moj.go.jp/MINJI/minji07_00015.html 海外の親権制度 https://www.moj.go.jp/MINJI/minji07_00030.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779118448985190860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C
  • createdAtMillis - 1713141474580
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779118448985190860DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C