Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 18:58:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Important context: This is a broad criticism being presented as fact, despite giving no actual reason. Because the poster is the editor of the BMJ, this has a misleading effect as the tweet is being quote tweeted as factual evidence rather than a personal opinion. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779082418315571360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713034691209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1779082418315571360D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F