Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 19:44:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61F25535840BE23318CB9A297B82071DBE71FF0B998E1F6A6549CBFD226E50A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Important context: This is a broad criticism being presented as fact, despite giving no actual reason. Because the poster is the editor of the BMJ, this has a misleading effect as the tweet is being quote tweeted as factual evidence rather than a personal opinion. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779082418315571360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61F25535840BE23318CB9A297B82071DBE71FF0B998E1F6A6549CBFD226E50A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1713210284690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177908241831557136061F25535840BE23318CB9A297B82071DBE71FF0B998E1F6A6549CBFD226E50A4