Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 07:41:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE0FC19414C94A013FEB23FCCCC5B933987FB48EA770A5D12291BC9BF4FEE046
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The source cited in the proposed note points out that while other options are available, this is the one chosen to be promoted, and many of the others are equally skimpy. https://t.co/LnUf5fcaDC

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779031283785404459
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE0FC19414C94A013FEB23FCCCC5B933987FB48EA770A5D12291BC9BF4FEE046
  • createdAtMillis - 1712994105141
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779031283785404459EE0FC19414C94A013FEB23FCCCC5B933987FB48EA770A5D12291BC9BF4FEE046