Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 15:41:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F82C778A4B306674BC7A6549776837809CD5E05851527BCBCABDEF47A4F6244B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - None of the studies were excluded solely for not being double blind. Studies that were not double blind were included if rated higher quality. Systematic reviews rate the quality of evidence and decide what to include based on that. This is how every area of medicine works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778997408971501872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F82C778A4B306674BC7A6549776837809CD5E05851527BCBCABDEF47A4F6244B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713022909223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778997408971501872F82C778A4B306674BC7A6549776837809CD5E05851527BCBCABDEF47A4F6244B