Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 18:33:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAEB6E14085F2D6CFBCFBF354E3FB0F898E1626D62041C5B74C2A1103D8E0914
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - None of the studies were excluded solely for not being double blind. Studies that were not double blind were included if rated higher quality. Systematic reviews rate the quality of evidence and decide what to include based on that. This is how every area of medicine works.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778997408971501872
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAEB6E14085F2D6CFBCFBF354E3FB0F898E1626D62041C5B74C2A1103D8E0914
  • createdAtMillis - 1713292425210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778997408971501872DAEB6E14085F2D6CFBCFBF354E3FB0F898E1626D62041C5B74C2A1103D8E0914