Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-13 19:00:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details