Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 20:49:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE526441873F146E61FF6D169A170B4B58C6652348F6C94082980874DB92E211
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778885171439366326
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE526441873F146E61FF6D169A170B4B58C6652348F6C94082980874DB92E211
  • createdAtMillis - 1713041351171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778885171439366326CE526441873F146E61FF6D169A170B4B58C6652348F6C94082980874DB92E211