Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-13 05:28:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CB1652734B975B9E67DAA3C826DD0A92F642891CECCC6D1A73366D329D4DAB36
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details