Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-13 17:06:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9916C3BA13C515967429A73807E70C61CF52967CFFB625D1E638DCFB36287EA9
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details