Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-17 14:19:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 97F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details