Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-12 23:38:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9380606F6B303E66BB878875D09478F57C05DE4F28853D1009B4B058AD347F11
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details