Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-15 20:44:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 81315FA84D59AC7F54EA86FECA1BAD2571E462A852B80108E70A58CF36CAEFB5
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details