Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-13 00:18:32 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 27408AC65122685EE2B7320D190B33E719BBD142F88BFFC34C9D5EEBCF984024
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details