Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-12 22:16:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1B1CB1E274FAC90F3FE6B0066D9F24CBEA09F6B8F554966DD5F291A9F389F072
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is criticized for having excluded studies that were not double-blind trials. And indeed, the Health Research Authority has recognized that such double-blind trials regarding trans care would be biased, probably unconclusive, and unethical. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/governance/feedback-raising-concerns/investigation-study-early-pubertal-suppression-carefully-selected-group-adolescents-gender-identity-disorders/
All Note Details