Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 12:14:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB8F8D0DC6CC540989EAB0E5E74EC79AEE645FFFEE6318E1397583FE438772F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es wurden mehrere Verstöße festgestellt. U.a. hätte der Gemeindewahlausschuss den Wahlvorschlag nicht zur Wahl zulassen dürfen, da die vom Gesetz ausdrücklich vorgeschriebene "eigenhändige Unterschrift" des AfD-Bewerbers fehlte. https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen/chemnitz/freiberg/grossschirma-buergermeister-afd-wahl-ungueltig-neuwahl-100~amp.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1778863083600961589
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EB8F8D0DC6CC540989EAB0E5E74EC79AEE645FFFEE6318E1397583FE438772F3
createdAtMillis - 1713010494552
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1778863083600961589EB8F8D0DC6CC540989EAB0E5E74EC79AEE645FFFEE6318E1397583FE438772F3