Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 20:08:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFB6B9CBE909758E3EF26FA6A987E2E24EFB8B8E6EA203935345EB9680A61986
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es wurden mehrere Verstöße festgestellt. U.a. hätte der Gemeindewahlausschuss den Wahlvorschlag nicht zur Wahl zulassen dürfen, da die vom Gesetz ausdrücklich vorgeschriebene "eigenhändige Unterschrift" des AfD-Bewerbers fehlte. https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen/chemnitz/freiberg/grossschirma-buergermeister-afd-wahl-ungueltig-neuwahl-100~amp.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1778863083600961589
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BFB6B9CBE909758E3EF26FA6A987E2E24EFB8B8E6EA203935345EB9680A61986
createdAtMillis - 1712952498142
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1778863083600961589BFB6B9CBE909758E3EF26FA6A987E2E24EFB8B8E6EA203935345EB9680A61986