Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 18:54:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4502CDE3A1C295EFF746D30F3D5EA0E258B1033D323E99BD767A4D0B474B70E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Naomi Wolf’s research methods began to be scrutinized and widely discredited in 2019, prior to the Covid pandemic. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/24/books/naomi-wolf-outrages.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778838559123718400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4502CDE3A1C295EFF746D30F3D5EA0E258B1033D323E99BD767A4D0B474B70E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713034451685
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1778838559123718400E4502CDE3A1C295EFF746D30F3D5EA0E258B1033D323E99BD767A4D0B474B70E