Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 20:31:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D5A79B36DCBCDBFEDF42D1088E327EDF5E735EAEB7AA0BC9D4FC35FC42442EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Naomi Wolf’s research methods began to be scrutinized and widely discredited in 2019, prior to the Covid pandemic. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/24/books/naomi-wolf-outrages.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778838559123718400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D5A79B36DCBCDBFEDF42D1088E327EDF5E735EAEB7AA0BC9D4FC35FC42442EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1713040266121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17788385591237184002D5A79B36DCBCDBFEDF42D1088E327EDF5E735EAEB7AA0BC9D4FC35FC42442EB