Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 18:43:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA0B3CDFF6AC27069E6471AC5A66A9CA18CE213924236DADC4FB65D0D7060B8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Al intentar justificar la inversión en ciencia haciendo uso de un solo caso de éxito el autor incurre en lo que se llama Falacia de evidencia incompleta o "cherry picking" (Notar también que el autor introduce el post como una ironía) https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falacia_de_evidencia_incompleta

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778835972278603855
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA0B3CDFF6AC27069E6471AC5A66A9CA18CE213924236DADC4FB65D0D7060B8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1713033802652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1778835972278603855CA0B3CDFF6AC27069E6471AC5A66A9CA18CE213924236DADC4FB65D0D7060B8C