Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 21:35:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E4714620B1BB01EA9EC94FC1EE52790E0E1B3D91DCD969AD81CDD4ECD98609B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Al intentar justificar la inversión en ciencia haciendo uso de un solo caso de éxito el autor incurre en lo que se llama Falacia de evidencia incompleta o "cherry picking" (Notar también que el autor introduce el post como una ironía) https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falacia_de_evidencia_incompleta

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778835972278603855
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E4714620B1BB01EA9EC94FC1EE52790E0E1B3D91DCD969AD81CDD4ECD98609B
  • createdAtMillis - 1712957701055
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17788359722786038551E4714620B1BB01EA9EC94FC1EE52790E0E1B3D91DCD969AD81CDD4ECD98609B