Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 11:26:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC71EB9CD4CA15EB5EAF2656683F7B03E1C2210B3D6DB1B06B087DD6A6A52935
Participant Details

Original Note:

Criticisms of the cass report are that it does not apply research methods correctly due to an over focus on RCTs despite RCTs not always being ethical, practical or the most effective method of testing: https://behavioralscientist.org/rcts-are-not-always-the-answer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778738497928536238
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC71EB9CD4CA15EB5EAF2656683F7B03E1C2210B3D6DB1B06B087DD6A6A52935
  • createdAtMillis - 1712921183274
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1778738497928536238DC71EB9CD4CA15EB5EAF2656683F7B03E1C2210B3D6DB1B06B087DD6A6A52935